Plausible Denial has ratings and 34 reviews. Nathan said: Ultimately, Mark Lane’s book comes off as more self-serving than it does truthful or provab. Mark Lane, in Plausible Denial, claims to have convinced a jury that E. Howard Hunt was a Kennedy assassination conspirator. Plausible Denial: Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK? Mark Lane, Author Thunder’s Mouth $ (p) ISBN

Author: Malamuro Nikinos
Country: Chile
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Spiritual
Published (Last): 10 August 2006
Pages: 22
PDF File Size: 2.83 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.37 Mb
ISBN: 410-2-88170-438-5
Downloads: 64224
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yogar

Non-fiction books plausible denial mark lane the assassination of John F. That was the type of assurance I was forced to give to my family.

Nov 23, Alice rated it it was amazing Shelves: Hunt won a libel judgment against The Spotlight inbut it land thrown out on appeal, and the case was retried in in Miami. New testimony is presented.

While plausible denial mark lane a matter of record, quietly disregarded by most news media at the time, that Lane won the case, the degree of his success in trying Hunt, in effect, for the murder of Kennedy venial emerges in this book.

Dec 06, Chad rated it it was amazing. The details behind the little-publicized trial in which E.

Plausible Denial: Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK? by Mark Lane

Mark Lane was one of the earliest critics of the Warren Commission report. The trial is the framework around which Lane builds the book’s examination of what plausiboe sees as plausible denial mark lane CIA’s role in both planning and executing the plot, and then in covering up the true facts.

Hunt had sued a small, right-wing journal for defamation of character upon their claim to this effect. Did you used to see him all plausible denial mark lane time when once he started going around?


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Some of our co-workers and Sturgis. Finally Hunt spoke, looking away from the jurors:. The explosive facts surrounding the CIA’s involvement plausible denial mark lane President Kennedy’s murder, presented for the first time lzne paperback.

They, not the two CIA-arranged witnesses, held in their hands the alibi their father so desperately required. Denia, never saw anyone else that morning who could have seen him. For that, plausible denial mark lane would be advised to turn to Anthony Summers’ Conspiracy or other books currently on the market.

Quoting the UPI story:. While I thoroughly enjoyed this book it was NOT an easy read.

Plausible Denial, Mark Lane, E. Howard Hunt, and the Liberty Lobby Trial

This page was last edited on 2 Decemberat To hear Lane tell it, plausible denial mark lane convinced the jury that there was a conspiracy in the Kennedy assassination, and that Hunt was a part of that conspiracy. Much of the text is self-praise plausibl a court victory against E.

Hunt initially sued mxrk won a settlement, but Lane had this overturned on appeal. Also plausible denial mark lane to learn of the more recent tape recording made by E. Mqrk Luther King, Jr.

The information that Lane conveniently ignored in this case is quite telling. It should not be the first book someone who wants to know more about the assassination should read, it was more plausible denial mark lane than some others. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.

Plausible Denial: Was the CIA Involved in the Assassination of JFK?

Lists with This Pausible. Consider, for example, the following portion of the Lorenz deposition:. Among the first and for a long time the best criticism of the Warren Commission’s official version that lone nut Lee Harvey Oswald had killed the president, Lane’s plausible denial mark lane first book Rush to Judgment literally cited chapter and verse to demonstrate that the Warren Report was, in his words, “a fraudulent document.


This book is a real ball buster to be quite forward about it.

Ed Dolan and Jean Davison provided plzusible information that aided the writing of plausible denial mark lane article. She was apparently willing to help Hunt out, but not if she had to name a single other person who might come forward to dispute her account. They are free to — indeed are expected to — spin any piece of information to benefit their clients.

Very informative and I definitely believe that the CIA had something to do with the assassination. According to Kuzmuk, Hunt and his wife had driven by in the early afternoon of November 22 as he exited from a downtown Washington restaurant. In addition to the story, Lane gently provides the reader with a remarkably detailed yet painless primer on the American adjudication process of libel, a surprising and most enlightening benefit.

He makes some startling comparisons and and plausible denial mark lane some overwhelming evidence surrounding E.

The plaintiff did not call McDonald; Hunt explained that she had been absent that day. People who want to trace the origins of JFK conspiracies. Sep 10, Tony Moore rated it liked it. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. The record revealed that as each new allegation was made, asserting that E. Jul 29, D. Retrieved from plausible denial mark lane https: